Statement: All students were present today. Conclusions: I. Nobody was absent. II. Ravi was present. MCQ with Answer and Explanation

Statement: All students were present today. Conclusions: I. Nobody was absent. II. Ravi was present.
A. Neither I nor II follows
B. Only II follows
C. Only I follows
D. Both I and II follow
Answer: Option D
Solution (By JKSSB Mock Tests)
I follows directly (all present = no absent). II follows if Ravi is a student (implied context). Both follow.

Discuss this Question (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Practice More Statement and Conclusion Questions

Question #1
Statement: Smoking causes cancer. Conclusions: I. All cancer patients are smokers. II. Quitting smoking reduces the risk of cancer.
A. Neither I nor II follows
B. Only II follows
C. Only I follows
D. Both I and II follow

Correct Answer: Option B


Explanation:
I is false: cancer can be caused by other factors. II logically follows because if smoking causes cancer, then not smoking reduces risk.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #2
Statement: He is the eldest son. Conclusions: I. He has younger siblings. II. His parents have only one son.
A. Only I follows
B. Both I and II follow
C. Neither I nor II follows
D. Only II follows

Correct Answer: Option A


Explanation:
Eldest son implies there are other children (younger), so I follows. Only one son is false if he is eldest among sons. So II does not follow.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #3
Statement: Most of the Bihari Boys are attracted towards govt. services.
Conclusions:
I. In Bihar jobs in private sector are less.
II. There is no attraction towards govt. services in boys of other states.
A. Both conclusions I and II follow
B. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
C. Only conclusion II follows
D. Only conclusion I follows

Correct Answer: Option B


Explanation:
Neither conclusion follows. The statement does not give any reason for the attraction, so I cannot be inferred. It also makes no claim about boys of other states, so II does not follow.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion