Statement: By 2005 to achieve 70% literacy, a new scheme has been started on 2/5/2001. Conclusions: I. On 2/5/2001 literacy is less than 70%. II. This new scheme would be completed by 2005. MCQ with Answer and Explanation

Statement: By 2005 to achieve 70% literacy, a new scheme has been started on 2/5/2001.
Conclusions:
I. On 2/5/2001 literacy is less than 70%.
II. This new scheme would be completed by 2005.
A. Both conclusions I and II follow
B. Only conclusion I follows
C. Only conclusion II follows
D. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Answer: Option D
Solution (By JKSSB Mock Tests)
Neither conclusion follows. The statement sets a target to achieve 70% literacy by 2005, but the current literacy rate is not explicitly stated (it could already be 70% or higher, aiming to maintain). Conclusion II is not stated; the scheme started on that date, but its completion date is not mentioned.

Discuss this Question (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Practice More Statement and Conclusion Questions

Question #1
Statement: This road is under construction. Conclusions: I. It is closed for traffic. II. The work is not finished yet.
A. Only II follows
B. Only I follows
C. Both I and II follow
D. Neither I nor II follows

Correct Answer: Option C


Explanation:
Under construction typically means incomplete and may be closed or have limited access. Both follow.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #2
Statements:
1. All squares are triangles.
2. No triangle is a circle.
Conclusions:
I. No square is a circle.
II. No circle is a square.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Neither I nor II follows
C. Only conclusion II follows
D. Both I and II follow

Correct Answer: Option D


Explanation:
Since all squares are inside the triangle category, and nothing in the triangle category touches the circle category, squares and circles can never overlap. Therefore, both 'No square is a circle' and 'No circle is a square' are true.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #3
Statements:
1. Some shirts are pants.
2. Some pants are ties.
Conclusions:
I. Some shirts are ties.
II. Some ties are shirts.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Both I and II follow
B. Neither I nor II follows
C. Only conclusion II follows
D. Only conclusion I follows

Correct Answer: Option B


Explanation:
The relationship 'some' does not chain logically. The shirts that are pants are not necessarily the pants that are ties. No relation can be established between shirts and ties. Therefore, neither conclusion follows.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion