Statements:
1. All actors are handsome.
2. John is handsome.
Conclusions:
I. John is an actor.
II. John is not an actor.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
Explanation:
John is in the 'handsome' category, but we do not know if he is inside the 'actor' sub-category or outside it. Therefore, neither is definite. However, since he must either be an actor or not an actor, the 'either/or' condition applies.
Statement:
The company has launched a new smartphone with advanced AI features at an affordable price.
Conclusions:
I. The company wants to attract tech-savvy customers.
II. The company's previous smartphones were very expensive.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
Explanation:
Launching advanced AI features indicates an intent to attract people interested in such tech (Conclusion I). However, the statement provides no information about the pricing history of the company's previous phones (Conclusion II).
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!