Statement: If you work hard, you will succeed in the examination. Conclusions: I. Hard work is a sufficient condition for success in the examination. II. Without hard work, one cannot succeed in the examination. Which conclusion(s) logically follow? MCQ with Answer and Explanation

Statement:
If you work hard, you will succeed in the examination.
Conclusions:
I. Hard work is a sufficient condition for success in the examination.
II. Without hard work, one cannot succeed in the examination.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Both I and II follow
C. Neither I nor II follows
D. Only conclusion II follows
Answer: Option A
Solution (By JKSSB Mock Tests)
The statement is an 'If A then B' proposition. It means hard work guarantees success (I follows). However, it does not state 'Only if you work hard', meaning there could be other ways to succeed (e.g., being naturally brilliant). Thus, II does not logically follow.

Discuss this Question (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Practice More Statement and Conclusion Questions

Question #1
Statement: The temperature today is 40°C. Conclusions: I. It is a hot day. II. It is summer.
A. Neither I nor II follows
B. Only II follows
C. Both I and II follow
D. Only I follows

Correct Answer: Option D


Explanation:
40°C is hot, so I follows. It could be hot even in other seasons, so II does not follow.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #2
Statement: He is an Indian citizen. Conclusions: I. He was born in India. II. He holds an Indian passport.
A. Only I follows
B. Only II follows
C. Both I and II follow
D. Neither I nor II follows

Correct Answer: Option B


Explanation:
Citizen may not be born in India (could be naturalized). Having an Indian passport is a typical indicator of citizenship, so II follows.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #3
Statement:
Despite heavy security, a theft occurred in the museum.
Conclusions:
I. The security guards were involved in the theft.
II. Heavy security is not a 100% guarantee against theft.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Only conclusion II follows
B. Only conclusion I follows
C. Neither I nor II follows
D. Both I and II follow

Correct Answer: Option A


Explanation:
The statement simply states a fact that theft occurred despite security. Assuming guard involvement (I) is speculation. However, it logically proves that heavy security does not entirely eliminate the possibility of theft (II).

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion