Statement: On metro section of railways, the motormen are frequently required to do overtime during May and June though all vacancies are completely filled as per requirement of this section. Conclusions: I. Many motormen take leave of shorter or longer duration during this period. II. Some motormen desire to earn overtime whenever possible. MCQ with Answer and Explanation

Statement: On metro section of railways, the motormen are frequently required to do overtime during May and June though all vacancies are completely filled as per requirement of this section.
Conclusions:
I. Many motormen take leave of shorter or longer duration during this period.
II. Some motormen desire to earn overtime whenever possible.
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Both conclusions I and II follow
C. Only conclusion II follows
D. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Answer: Option D
Solution (By JKSSB Mock Tests)
Neither conclusion follows. Overtime could be due to increased workload, not necessarily leave. The statement does not discuss motormen's desire to earn overtime.

Discuss this Question (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Practice More Statement and Conclusion Questions

Question #1
Statement: India won the cricket match by 5 wickets. Conclusions: I. The opponent team lost all wickets. II. India chased the target successfully.
A. Both I and II follow
B. Only I follows
C. Neither I nor II follows
D. Only II follows

Correct Answer: Option D


Explanation:
Winning by 5 wickets implies India achieved the target with 5 wickets in hand; the opponent's wickets are irrelevant. So I does not follow, II follows.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #2
Statement: This road is under construction. Conclusions: I. It is closed for traffic. II. The work is not finished yet.
A. Both I and II follow
B. Only I follows
C. Only II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows

Correct Answer: Option A


Explanation:
Under construction typically means incomplete and may be closed or have limited access. Both follow.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #3
Statement:
Despite heavy security, a theft occurred in the museum.
Conclusions:
I. The security guards were involved in the theft.
II. Heavy security is not a 100% guarantee against theft.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Neither I nor II follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Only conclusion I follows
D. Both I and II follow

Correct Answer: Option B


Explanation:
The statement simply states a fact that theft occurred despite security. Assuming guard involvement (I) is speculation. However, it logically proves that heavy security does not entirely eliminate the possibility of theft (II).

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion