Statement: Quality has a price tag. India is allocating lots of funds to education. Conclusions: I. Quality of education in India would improve soon. II. Funding alone can enhance quality of education. MCQ with Answer and Explanation
Statement: Quality has a price tag. India is allocating lots of funds to education.
Conclusions:
I. Quality of education in India would improve soon.
II. Funding alone can enhance quality of education.
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Both conclusions I and II follow
D. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Answer: Option D
Solution (By JKSSB Mock Tests)
Conclusion I does not follow because allocating funds does not guarantee immediate improvement. Conclusion II is not supported; the statement does not say funding alone is sufficient for quality.
Explanation:
I: fish is meat, so it's plausible, but the statement doesn't guarantee it; some cats may not eat fish. II is a reverse error. Neither follows logically from the given statement.
Explanation:
If he sells only fresh vegetables, he does not sell stale ones. I directly follows. No information about other vendors, so II does not follow.
Statements:
1. Some boys are students.
2. All students are tall.
Conclusions:
I. Some boys are tall.
II. All boys are tall.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
Explanation:
The boys who are students must be tall because all students are tall. Hence, some boys are tall (I). We do not know about the boys who are not students, so we cannot conclude all boys are tall (II).
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!