Statement: Quality has a price tag. India is allocating plenty of funds to education. Conclusions: I. Quality of education in India would improve. II. Funding alone can enhance the quality of education. Which conclusion(s) logically follow? MCQ with Answer and Explanation
Statement:
Quality has a price tag. India is allocating plenty of funds to education.
Conclusions:
I. Quality of education in India would improve.
II. Funding alone can enhance the quality of education.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Neither I nor II follows
B. Both I and II follow
C. Only conclusion I follows
D. Only conclusion II follows
Answer: Option C
Solution (By JKSSB Mock Tests)
The statement sets up a correlation between price (funds) and quality. If India is allocating funds to education, it logically follows that the intended quality would improve (I). However, the statement doesn't claim funding *alone* is sufficient without proper execution (II does not follow).
Explanation:
I is an invalid conversion. II: 'some are red' does not imply some are not red; it's possible all roses are red but the statement only says some. So neither follows.
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!