Statement: The literacy rate in the state has increased by 15% over the last decade due to government initiatives. Conclusions: I. The government's initiatives were effective in promoting education. II. The state had a very low literacy rate ten years ago. Which conclusion(s) logically follow? MCQ with Answer and Explanation

Statement:
The literacy rate in the state has increased by 15% over the last decade due to government initiatives.
Conclusions:
I. The government's initiatives were effective in promoting education.
II. The state had a very low literacy rate ten years ago.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Neither I nor II follows
D. Both I and II follow
Answer: Option A
Solution (By JKSSB Mock Tests)
The statement directly attributes the increase to government initiatives, meaning they were effective (I). However, an increase of 15% doesn't tell us the starting point; it could have increased from 70% to 85%, which is not 'very low'. Thus, II does not follow.

Discuss this Question (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Practice More Statement and Conclusion Questions

Question #1
Statement: He is a millionaire. Conclusions: I. He has a lot of money. II. He earns a high salary.
A. Neither I nor II follows
B. Only II follows
C. Only I follows
D. Both I and II follow

Correct Answer: Option C


Explanation:
I directly follows: a millionaire has lots of money. II does not necessarily follow; he may have inherited wealth, not a salary.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #2
Statements:
1. All actors are handsome.
2. John is handsome.
Conclusions:
I. John is an actor.
II. John is not an actor.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Either I or II follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Only conclusion I follows
D. Neither I nor II follows

Correct Answer: Option A


Explanation:
John is in the 'handsome' category, but we do not know if he is inside the 'actor' sub-category or outside it. Therefore, neither is definite. However, since he must either be an actor or not an actor, the 'either/or' condition applies.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #3
Statement:
If India wins the match, a public holiday will be declared.
Conclusions:
I. India won the match, so a public holiday was declared.
II. A public holiday was declared, so India must have won the match.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow from the given rule?
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Both I and II follow
C. Only conclusion II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows

Correct Answer: Option A


Explanation:
The statement represents 'If A then B' (A implies B). Therefore, if A happens, B definitely happens (Conclusion I). However, B could happen for other reasons (e.g., a festival), so B does not necessarily imply A (Conclusion II is a logical fallacy known as affirming the consequent).

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion