Statement: The movie has subtitles. Conclusions: I. It is in a foreign language. II. Hearing-impaired people can understand it. MCQ with Answer and Explanation
Statement: The movie has subtitles. Conclusions: I. It is in a foreign language. II. Hearing-impaired people can understand it.
A. Only I follows
B. Only II follows
C. Neither I nor II follows
D. Both I and II follow
Answer: Option B
Solution (By JKSSB Mock Tests)
Subtitles can be for foreign language films or for accessibility. I is not necessarily true; it could be in the same language for deaf viewers. II is a direct utility, so it follows.
Statement: Quality has a price tag. India is allocating lots of funds to education.
Conclusions:
I. Quality of education in India would improve soon.
II. Funding alone can enhance quality of education.
Explanation:
Conclusion I does not follow because allocating funds does not guarantee immediate improvement. Conclusion II is not supported; the statement does not say funding alone is sufficient for quality.
Statement:
The company has launched a new smartphone with advanced AI features at an affordable price.
Conclusions:
I. The company wants to attract tech-savvy customers.
II. The company's previous smartphones were very expensive.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
Explanation:
Launching advanced AI features indicates an intent to attract people interested in such tech (Conclusion I). However, the statement provides no information about the pricing history of the company's previous phones (Conclusion II).
Explanation:
I: fish is meat, so it's plausible, but the statement doesn't guarantee it; some cats may not eat fish. II is a reverse error. Neither follows logically from the given statement.
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!