Statement: A company is hiring only engineers. Conclusions: I. No non-engineer will be hired. II. All engineers will be hired. MCQ with Answer and Explanation
Statement: By 2005 to achieve 70% literacy, a new scheme has been started on 2/5/2001.
Conclusions:
I. On 2/5/2001 literacy is less than 70%.
II. This new scheme would be completed by 2005.
Explanation:
Neither conclusion follows. The statement sets a target to achieve 70% literacy by 2005, but the current literacy rate is not explicitly stated (it could already be 70% or higher, aiming to maintain). Conclusion II is not stated; the scheme started on that date, but its completion date is not mentioned.
Statement:
The old order changed yielding place to new.
Conclusions:
I. Change is the law of nature.
II. Discard old ideas because they are old.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
Explanation:
The statement reflects a philosophical truth that old things are eventually replaced by new things, reflecting the law of continuous change (I). However, it does not prescribe actively discarding ideas *just* because they are old (II).
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!