Statement: After collision of two vessels in the sea all the crewmen and passengers are declared as missing - A news report. Conclusions: I. No one from the two vessels has survived after the collision. II. A few persons from the two vessels may have survived and are missing. MCQ with Answer and Explanation

Statement: After collision of two vessels in the sea all the crewmen and passengers are declared as missing - A news report.
Conclusions:
I. No one from the two vessels has survived after the collision.
II. A few persons from the two vessels may have survived and are missing.
A. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Only conclusion I follows
D. Both conclusions I and II follow
Answer: Option C
Solution (By JKSSB Mock Tests)
Conclusion I follows because 'declared missing' in such contexts implies no survivors have been found, so it can be concluded that no one survived. Conclusion II is contradictory; if some may have survived, they would not all be declared missing without hope.

Discuss this Question (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Practice More Statement and Conclusion Questions

Question #1
Statement: The traffic signal turned green. Conclusions: I. Vehicles may start moving. II. Pedestrians should not cross.
A. Both I and II follow
B. Neither I nor II follows
C. Only I follows
D. Only II follows

Correct Answer: Option C


Explanation:
Green signal means go for vehicles (I). Pedestrians may still cross at zebra crossing; no explicit rule given. So II does not follow.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #2
Statements:
1. No dog is a cat.
2. All cats are lions.
Conclusions:
I. No dog is a lion.
II. Some lions are not dogs.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Both I and II follow
D. Neither I nor II follows

Correct Answer: Option B


Explanation:
All cats are lions, and no dog is a cat. This means dogs cannot enter the 'cat' portion of the 'lion' circle. Therefore, those lions which are cats are definitely not dogs (Conclusion II). However, dogs could still overlap with the non-cat portion of lions, so Conclusion I does not follow.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #3
Statement: Good health is a luxury in country 'P' where rate of death is very high compared to other nations of that region.
Conclusions:
I. People in country 'P' cannot afford to have many luxuries of life.
II. Good health is a gift of the nature.
A. Both conclusions I and II follow
B. Only conclusion I follows
C. Only conclusion II follows
D. Neither conclusion I nor II follows

Correct Answer: Option A


Explanation:
Both conclusions follow. If good health itself is a luxury, it implies people lack many basic luxuries (I). Describing good health as a luxury also implies it is not naturally given to all, i.e., it is a gift of nature that not everyone receives (II).

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion