Statement: Those hilly areas will be declared backward where forest area does not exist. Conclusions: I. Hilly forest areas are not backward. II. In backward areas hills are without forest. MCQ with Answer and Explanation

Statement: Those hilly areas will be declared backward where forest area does not exist.
Conclusions:
I. Hilly forest areas are not backward.
II. In backward areas hills are without forest.
A. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
B. Only conclusion I follows
C. Both conclusions I and II follow
D. Only conclusion II follows
Answer: Option B
Solution (By JKSSB Mock Tests)
Conclusion I follows: if a hilly area lacks forest, it is declared backward; therefore, hilly areas with forest are not declared backward. Conclusion II does not follow because the statement only defines a condition for declaring backwardness, not that all backward areas are hilly and without forest.

Discuss this Question (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Practice More Statement and Conclusion Questions

Question #1
Statements:
1. Some scientists are philosophers.
2. All philosophers are writers.
Conclusions:
I. Some writers are scientists.
II. All scientists are writers.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Both I and II follow
B. Only conclusion I follows
C. Only conclusion II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows

Correct Answer: Option B


Explanation:
The scientists who are philosophers must also be writers because all philosophers are writers. Therefore, some writers are scientists (Conclusion I). We cannot say all scientists are writers based on the given premises (Conclusion II).

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #2
Statements:
1. Some phones are smart.
2. No smart thing is cheap.
Conclusions:
I. Some phones are not cheap.
II. No phone is cheap.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Only conclusion II follows
B. Neither I nor II follows
C. Both I and II follow
D. Only conclusion I follows

Correct Answer: Option D


Explanation:
The phones that are smart cannot be cheap (since no smart thing is cheap). Therefore, at least some phones are definitely not cheap (Conclusion I). We don't know about the phones that are not smart, so II does not follow.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #3
Statements:
1. All apples are fruits.
2. No fruit is a vegetable.
3. Some vegetables are healthy.
Conclusions:
I. No apple is a vegetable.
II. Some healthy things are not apples.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Both I and II follow
B. Neither I nor II follows
C. Only conclusion II follows
D. Only conclusion I follows

Correct Answer: Option A


Explanation:
Since apples are fruits and no fruits are vegetables, apples cannot be vegetables (I follows). Some vegetables are healthy, and since vegetables cannot be apples, those healthy vegetables are definitely not apples (II follows).

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion