S1: Under Ind AS 36, an impairment loss recognized in prior periods for an asset other than goodwill must be reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset's recoverable amount. S2: The increased carrying amount of an asset due to reversal of an impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized. Which statement(s) is/are correct?
Explanation:
Both statements are correct as per Ind AS 36. Impairment losses (except for goodwill) must be reversed when conditions change, but the asset's carrying amount cannot exceed its hypothetical carrying amount (net of depreciation) had no impairment occurred.
Explanation:
Marginal cost represents the total variable cost of production, which is the sum of prime cost (direct material, labor, expenses) and variable overheads.
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!